Tuesday 18 December 2018

Review: "The Predator"



BLACK, Shane, “The Predator”, Twentieth Century Fox/Davis Entertainment, 2018.


I’ve seen some pretty stupid movies in my time. Is this the stupidest? I’m thinking it has to be Top Five.

It’s not the concept – which has been road-tested to Hell and back – and it’s not even the thespians involved, who range from ‘mediocre’ to a solid ‘good’, depending upon the vehicle; it’s the writers and the producers and the director who are squarely to blame for this piece of trash. But first: some history.

Back in the Dark Ages (1987), there was a crackpot movie that came out of nowhere and took the world by storm. It was about a bunch of tough-as-nails, top-flight-but-seriously-damaged soldier-boys who went down into South America to make the lives of some drug cartel losers extremely difficult. On the way out, they ran into some trouble: trouble with a capital ‘T’ from outer space, out to indulge its joy of a-huntin’ and a-fishin’. An alien redneck to be precise. That movie was “Predator”. It was lightning in a bottle; magic: effortlessly good.

A few years went by during which some Hollywood types tried to think of a way to capitalise on the success of this film and their overarching concern took the form of the mantra “Don’t Fuck It Up!”. In 1990, they re-located everything to the big city for 1) contrast, and 2) budgetary concerns. They lost Arnie, but they snagged Danny Glover (straight off of the “Lethal Weapon” franchise success) and they made a solid, but tentative sequel – tentative in that it didn’t really do anything new and left everyone wanting more. They hadn’t fucked it up, but as a concept it was still treading water.

What they HAD done was show the skull of H.R. Giger’s Xenomorph hanging on the wall of the Predator’s space-buggy and this set bells ringing in franchise-land. Why don’t we show the Predator macking on an Alien? How cool would that be?! Yes, yes, cool indeed but two big-budget films couldn’t do the concept justice – “AVP: Alien vs. Predator” (2004) and “Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem” (2007) were both snore-fests of a grand order and did absolutely nothing to boost either parent franchise (although somehow we still got “Prometheus”…). Moving on:

The Hollywood dudes then obviously decided to get back to core business and so we got… Adrien Brody? Taking on… a Predator? Well, yes (spoiler alert!), he was the big monster in “The Village”, but that was just a dumb suit. Anyway, by this time he had an Oscar tucked in his belt and a stint as King Kong’s love rival in the Peter Jackson re-make behind him, so I guess the money people felt that all that pretty much amounted to “Arnie’s successor in a Predator movie” on paper. 2+2= um, 5? Anyway, “Predators” in 2010, was, as you’d expect, Gods-awful and not even Laurence Fishburne could pull its arse out of the flames.

All the while that this was going on, there was an entire fanbase of comics readers out there who were scratching their heads and asking themselves “how could they get it all so wrong?”. After all, from pretty much the moment Arnie walked out of the jungle in the first film - spitting out a tooth and flipping the alien red-neck the bird - Dark Horse Comics were right there, buying the rights to the property and starting to pump out year after year of high-quality, kick-arse narrative about these bad boys. With all this material flying about and pumping up the fans, how could they not make a smash-success of this property?

Well, by completely ignoring everything that the comics people were doing, that’s how. “Oh but we’re Hollywood,” they sneered; “we are a cut above the four-colour world and its tedious little maunderings. We have scope; and range; and investors who want to put pressure on our creative context in order to sell more sneakers and SUVs at the expense of any plot cohesion or artistic intent…”

*Ahem*

Anyhoo, despite all this source material, they dropped the ball.

And now there’s this.

The one thing that could be said about all of the intervening films, between the first one and this latest one, is that there was serious intent behind them. In every case, the intention was to make a solid, resonant, powerful iteration of the initial movie; something that would build on that fertile ground, say something new and move the project forward in bold directions. With this movie, the writers, director and producers got together and kicked things off with the immortal lines: “fuck it: let’s just paint-by-numbers and sink some brewskis!”

The result is this piece of garbage. It’s a complete pastiche of the first film – set in America this time so product placement can easily occur – and every character on screen is a caricature, not an actual person. Each piece of dialogue is heavily spiced with every four-letter word that they could find and Thomas Jane’s character even has Tourette’s, just to dial things up to 11. They play the Maximising Card by making a bigger, badder Predator (in the style of “The Meg”), rather than just using the ones that they already have with a bit more intelligence, and the Hollywood Morality play-book is firmly on hand as regards all of the female characters. On top of everything, they even have a running gag with a ‘Dog Predator’ repeatedly playing ‘fetch’ with a hand-grenade. Finally, just to add insult to injury, any of you out there who are on the Asperger’s Spectrum will be pleased to know that your affliction is just a sign of evolution in action. Your long-awaited super-power is in the mail.

Even the font that they used for the credits is bog-standard tedious.

Miss it. With intent.

One Tentacled Horror.

Saturday 1 December 2018

Review: "The Meg"



TURTELTAUB, Jon (Dir.), “The Meg”, Warner Bros. Pictures/Gravity Pictures, 2018.


I’m not a conspiracy nut, but there’s a part of me that thinks all of these shark films are part of a movement to discredit sharks and make them seem more villainous than they are (they aren’t) in order to prop up sales of bogus Chinese medicinal cures. Sharks universally get the rough end of the pineapple simply because nature’s take on an efficient killing machine doesn’t come with big puppy eyes and snugly fur. That doesn’t alter the fact that since 2006, more people in Australia have been killed by horses than they have by sharks, and the shark stats don’t even get out of the single digits. Despite this, stupid people who think that they suddenly develop a shield of immunity when they pop on their budgie-smugglers and jump into the surf, cry out in their fear for shark culls, drift nets and other ridiculous tactics that cost more lives (human and otherwise), time and effort than simply leaving. The Damned. Fish. ALONE!

(*Ahem!*)

In this flick, the creators sought to find a way to make the sharks bigger and meaner than ever before. In doing so, they turned to prehistory and decided to revive the biggest, baddest shark of all time, the Megalodon, or “Meg” as they have contracted it (and taken from the book series of the same name). It’s at this point that they start to come undone: in order to make us believe in this creature, they have to contrive a means whereby it could have survived the millennia without our ever being aware of it. Their rationale is that the beastie has been living far below what we’ve perceived as the bottom of the deepest undersea trench on the planet, held down there by a layer of freezing-cold water which prevents it rising to the surface. The realm below this layer, or “thermocline”, has been visually obscured for us by a drifting cloud of silt caught in its chilly embrace. Now, I’m not fully conversant in the ways that sonar works but I’m pretty certain that a cloud of silt doesn’t block its functioning; so the initial premise of this movie that no-one is even sure that there is a lower depth to the seabed than previously thought is a dubious one from the get-go.

Anyway, once we’ve floated this concept of a ‘deeper dark’, our heroes blithely wander down into it in their submersibles, only to be attacked first, by a giant squid, and later, by the Meg itself. “Oh no!” they cry, “who would have thought that there would be consequences to our unthinking hubris?” Anyway, we soon have stranded submersibles on the (actual) seafloor more than 11,000 metres below the surface and the support team in the seabase up above decides to call in an expert to save them.

That person turns out to be Jason Statham who plays the hard-bitten diving expert Jonas (see what they did there?), now hard-drinking in obscurity in Thailand. In the pre-credit sequence we see that he once tried to save some submariners in a stranded vessel way down in the trench but was forced to abandon half his team and some of the victims in order to flee the Meg’s assault. Since no-one else survived who saw the bite which the shark inflicted on the sub, Jonas is considered to have contracted some kind of depth-inflicted delusion and to have recklessly abandoned the rescue causing multiple deaths. Note well that, in this part of the flick, the nature of deep-sea diving effects upon the human corpus is played for all it’s worth; they abandon it pretty quickly hereafter.

Jonas decides not to become involved, but after learning that his ex-wife is trapped down in the dark, he decides to come on board. Now, movies bend the truth an awful lot and are a mine of disinformation (not only about the savagery and vindictiveness of sharks) but here we steer a course close to being recklessly loose with the truth. If you’ve ever gone SCUBA diving, you’ll be aware that you’re not supposed to drink alcohol for a certain time beforehand; it alters your blood chemistry and can make you susceptible to various forms of pressure-related incapacity. Nevertheless, our hero goes from hard-drinking in Thailand to jumping aboard a deep-sea submersible within a couple of hours. We’re asked to believe that he’s crazy because he once saw a big shark; I’m more prepared to call him crazy for participating at all in the rescue.

From here on in the gloves are off: pressure has no place in the Meg’s universe. Giant sharks can rocket up to the surface from 11,000 metres without exploding upon breaching the meniscus and people can do likewise. Ladies and gentlemen: physics has left the building.

All this being said, the rest of this flick is simply an action blockbuster, the plotting of which has nothing at all to add to the body of lore that already exists out there. It charts a course from “Jaws”, to “Deep Blue Sea”, through to “The Shallows”, without drawing breath, nimbly sidestepping everything we learned from “The Abyss”. The only difference is that all those movies said something interesting; this one does not.

What this film does bring to the mix is an interesting non-Eurocentric flavour. We begin our adventure in the China Sea, bounce around in Thailand for awhile, and then wash up on a Chinese beach resort. Along the way there are references to Taiwan, Japan, even Australia, in order to absolutely demonstrate that we aren’t in the Americas at all. The pool of non-Asian actors is quite small and this is a refreshing change. Obviously, this is because a huge whack of the funding for this movie came from Chinese sources, showing the influence which Beijing is able to exercise over international popular culture nowadays. In an affront to my conspiracy thinking ways, the Chinese characters in this story actually deplore the brutal destruction of sharks for their fins and pseudo-medical applications, so I was genuinely pleased by that inclusion.

Not that, let me be clear, there are any Oscars about to be handed out for the thespians in this vehicle. Jason Statham began his career as a likeable enough leading-man-slash-action-dude but after wallowing in the mire of “The Expendables” for far too long, has lost all intention of bringing nuance to his roles. He pouts; he sulks; he gets his shirt off and then looks around for the girl he’s gonna get. It’s all by the numbers without a trace of subtlety but then, how subtle do you need to be to punch a shark the size of a jumbo jet? There is absolutely no chemistry between him and the heroine, Li Bingbing, and the assumption that they’ll get together after the credits roll lies entirely in all the knowing winks and head nods of the other actors around them.

In the meantime, there’s a conniving billionaire businessman, a self-sacrificing doctor, several pairs of lifelong buddies who don’t survive, a black guy who doesn’t get eaten (following “Deep Blue Sea’s” innovation here), several cute girls to throw in harm’s way and an adorable eight-year-old to provide contrast with the monster: all by-the-numbers action movie plotting, with some agreeable visuals and the inevitable girls in bikinis. At least the dog survives.

Two-and-a-half Tentacled Horrors.



Review: "Occult Detective Quarterly", Issue #4 - Spring, 2018



GRANT, John Linwood, & Dave Brzeski (eds.), “Occult Detective Quarterly #4, Spring 2018”, Ulthar Press Books & Magazines (through Amazon US), 2018.

Quarto; paperback; 108pp., with many monochrome illustrations. Near fine.


I have to admit that I’d forgotten that I’d ordered this: what with one thing and another (the approach of Christmas etc.), it took quite a while to reach my front doorstep. Nevertheless, its arrival was greatly appreciated. There is much to enjoy between the covers of every issue of this magazine.

Things take awhile to develop. With something like this kind of publication, it usually takes a few issues to pin everything down and to start to perceive a sort of regular routine that can be followed in the production of each issue – call it ‘muscle memory’ if you will, but in my experience it’s a steep learning curve that only gets easier with each iteration. Gathering material, editing, commissioning artwork, proofing and pre-production are time-consuming aspects of this type of activity and, while never easy, get moreso with each turn around the block. This is issue number four in the life of this journal and the experience gained with the previous releases has obviously been taken on board to good effect. Even a shift from the original publishing entity seems not to have overly affected the production values and the result is a slick and pleasing product. And keep in mind that all of this effort is performed by people who have lives and careers to juggle as well!

Venues for amateur writing have changed dramatically since the days of the first Lovecraft Circle. These days, everyone has a computer and a word-processing program; everyone who ever thought that they had a book inside them waiting to be hammered down, can now spend the time to get it out there. Finding a place to get it published however, is the tricky part: traditional publishers are now awash with submissions and most of them get brought in by the post and taken straight out by the trash. These days, unless you have an agent and a solid publication record, getting your work into print is not easy. Fortunately, with the presence of Internet-based print-on-demand publications such as this, amateur writers can get points on the board and begin to generate the kind of fan-based interest that might lead to more substantial published works in the future. For this reason alone, “The Occult Detective Quarterly” (ODQ) deserves your attention and your monetary support.

The ambit of this publication is to publish amateur writing and art focussing on the activities of investigators confronted by aspects of the supernatural: the detectives may use supernatural means in the course of their searches, or they may simply stumble across mystical hurdles in their pursuit of the Truth. However the mayhem manifests, it adds layers of interest to the standard offerings of the crime fiction genre. By this issue of the series, several standard tropes have come to the fore: the US-based investigator who mixes police procedure with various creole magical systems, such as Vodoun, Santeria, or Hoodoo; the (generally, London-based) late-Victorian William Hope Hodgson pastiche echoing Carnacki’s efforts as chronicled by that author; the Raymond Chandler stylistic knock-off; the monster, or animal, as investigator story; and the New Age practitioner thrust into a dangerous situation. Within these frameworks there are possibilities to blend these forms creatively into each other to unearth new and ever more interesting variants. Along the way there are echoes of various other styles of writing – genre and literary fiction; weird literature; Lovecraftian tropes – which get combed-over and explored in many highly interesting ways. This issue covers much of this territory and delivers some stellar examples of the form. Let’s unpack:

Putting aside regular features for the moment, let’s jump straight to the stories. First cab off the rank is Simon Avery’s “Songs for Dwindled Gods”, an examination of mental illness and substance abuse wrapped up in the hallmarks of faery weirdness. Right from the start I was captivated by this narrative: it involves a recurrent manifestation of The Little People in rural modern-day England which wipes whole hamlet-sized communities off the map – they effectively become ‘forgotten’. Our narrator is the damaged son of a man whose town was obliterated by the arrival of a 60s hippy folk group - “Box of Trees” - who showed up, performed a concert and took the townsfolk away with them afterwards. Our storyteller’s dad was saved by the fact that he and his girlfriend decided to engage upon a romantic tryst before going to the concert. Thereafter the father – doomed to foster care for the rest of his pre-adulthood – developed an obsession for the band and its trail of missing communities. After his father’s death, our narrator finds his father’s notes on the phenomenon and picks up the thread with his own damaged girlfriend in tow… Stories about faeries always tread a knife-edge between believability and sparkly kitsch: not here. The Pale Folk in this story are as ferocious as they come and our investigators couldn’t be more broken and realistically drawn. The execution is brilliant and at no point did any of the plot (replete with time slips and 60s hippy-trippiness) ring false. By the time I finished reading this I wanted to break out all my Arthur Machen works and turn this into a “Call of Cthulhu” roleplaying scenario. This was an amazing and refreshing start to issue four.

Also very appealing was Davide Mana’s “Black Frog and Black Scarab”. This is a story about a group of Roman legionnaires carrying out police duties in Cairo, under the aegis of the Roman Empire. A young girl summons the vigiles and takes them to her house where a mummy has risen to seek her aid in obtaining vengeance for the theft of certain crucial parts of its multi-faceted soul. The Romans overcome their fear of the undead to seek out the sorcerer who is draining the nearby necropolis of its spiritual power and – in true, hard-nosed, by-the-books fashion – bring the situation to a satisfying conclusion. The author hamstrings himself somewhat in his narrative by insisting upon correct, triple-barrelled, Roman names for his troopers (including one distractingly-named “Troglodyte”) and by squeezing-in certain jargonistic terms pertinent to the Legion’s policing activities. This is fine if you’re writing an academic treatise on the period, or if you’re writing a longer work where such insertions can be indulged, but here it bogs the action down significantly as strange words and terms interrupt the flow of the story. Don’t get me wrong – I’m a stickler for period accuracy; but there are ways to seed these sorts of things into a fictional narrative without having to sacrifice the punch of the story.

I’m not a fan of paranormal romance. Too often it seems to me to be just Mills & Boon writing for those who are into necrophilia, or bestiality. All of the pretty-boys on the front covers turn out to be dashingly-undead, or shape-shifters who transform into hunky wolves, bears, or panthers (where are all the were-flamingos, I ask myself? Probably Las Vegas…). In “Charms” by Sarah Hans, we are definitely in this territory. This story feels like an episode of “Charmed” or, more pertinently, “Grimm”, except that the New Age, rune-casting heroine of our tale isn’t some fictive legendary animal in human guise but, rather, something far more sinister. When the son of one of her regular clients comes to her straight from gaol and demands with menaces that she convince his mother to bequeath all her wealth to him in her will, our rune-reader wavers and decides to comply. Later, when a dashing detective contacts her to ask if the son has been to her store and mentions that he has just discovered that the ne’er-do-well has taken out a contract on his mother, our rune-lore agent has a crisis of conscience. My main objection to these tales is that really interesting moral conundrums get tossed out before they’re fully examined, and everything plays out for the best – evil-doers get justice; nascent lovers unite; and even regular rune-reading clients whose trust has been sorely abused find an unlikely spirit of forgiveness. Like I said: not my cup of tea, but nevertheless engaging and amusing.

Josh Reynolds writes a series of stories featuring the character of Charles St. Cyprian, Royal Occultist and Defender of the Realm from Mystical Attack, in tandem with his erstwhile assistant, the gun-happy Cockney girl, Ebe Gallowglass. I’ve pointed out previously that – for me – these tales seem to be all flash and no substance, what with their obsession for character wardrobe, naff faux-Wodehouse dialogue and the constant name-dropping of gun brands. Nothing says ‘American author writing about British locales’ more clearly than an over-enthusiasm for period ballistics. This tale, “The Bascomb Rug”, is an attempt at a locked-room mystery set on a remote Orkney Isle that flags all of its secrets before the end of the piece’s title. Seriously – after reading the title, I knew what was coming and all of the red herrings and misdirection that followed were rendered ponderous and annoying as a result. Let it not be said that Mr. Reynolds cannot write well – there are plenty of atmospherics in this story which he captures to perfection – but the rest just comes off as too clever by half. I’ve read Neil Gaiman’s attempts at shaggy-dog stories and they don’t work either: as a rule, whenever you decide to throw down several thousand words in support of a bad pun, don’t.

Wandering into “The Burning Pile” I found myself wondering how many ventriloquists could there possibly be in the average-sized American city? A lot, if this story is anything to go by. In this tale, our hard-bitten police detectives are on the trail of something sinister that convinces professional ventriloquists to lock themselves away and starve themselves to death while kidnapping their dolls. The only clue is a transcribed ancient text in Sanskrit which our investigators decide to have translated by nearby academics. This is a genuinely creepy story and absolutely unnerving in its results and implications; however, my credulity was stretched by the fact that it took twelve – count them – twelve starving vents before the police solved the crime. I was perfectly willing to buy the supernatural underpinnings of the tale but I simply baulked at the possibility of the police being so inept.

Another return contributor, Aaron Vlek, gives us “The Case of the Black Lodge”. The idea of a cabal of British gentlemen who gather regularly to listen to the supernatural stories of a respected member of their clique is a mainstay of this type of fiction, dating back to the Victorian traditions of Christmas ghost-storytelling – a la Charles Dickens and M.R. James – and as featured in the Thomas Carnacki stories of William Hope Hodgson. This useful trope is the set-up for this tale of inter-cult intrigue and warfare, in which one London-based mystical sect attacks another and then gets their magical comeuppance. The tale suffers from being revealed in this state of several removes and it feels as if we are being told about distant events rather than being shown them. Again, the writer has a certain mastery of her craft – there’s a nice touch of tension-breaking when a brandy snifter thuds quietly onto the thick pile carpet of the room wherein the listeners are gathered – but there is no real sense of urgency from this third-hand narrative.

As a side note, the illustration which accompanies this piece, while well executed, has little to do with the story it is supposed to be showcasing. There is one female character in this story and her overt description reads nothing like the image of her – if it is supposed to be her - in the picture. Clearly the artist had no source material to work from – and it may have been that it was unavailable at the time of the piece’s execution (been there, done that!) – or they just chose to ignore it. Either way, while a small quibble – although possibly not for Ms. Vlek - it’s odd.

After I started reading “The French Lieutenant’s Gurning” I had to stop and look closer at the details: once I clocked that the writer was Rhys Hughes, I settled back in with better understanding. Mr. Hughes is a long-time member of the ergodic literature crowd, particularly of the Oulipo group based in France, which has included Italo Calvino and Georges Perec in its roster. These authors play with the structures of writing, seeking not only to provide a piece of fiction, but to come up with one that springs from carefully-formulated arbitrary restrictions and manipulations – Perec wrote a novel in French several hundred pages long, for example, that deliberately doesn’t use the letter ‘e’ at all. Spring-boarding off the title of the well-known John Fowles novel, this piece has our Paris-based detective chasing the ghost of a disembodied face – sliced from the head of a French officer by means of a super-sharp scimitar - through the city in an attempt to prevent it occupying such things as clouds and drying bed linen, from which to leer lecherously at passersby and harass them with its gurning – a traditional form of face-pulling. It’s an unusual take on the occult detective form which is wacky and mildly humorous; not everyone’s shot of bourbon though, I suspect.

“Those Who Live in Shadow” by Paul M. Feeney is a story of the monster-detective variety. True to its type, our investigator conceals his monstrous nature behind a human-seeming exterior and only breaks out the beast when the plot requires. This is a classic film noir cross-and-double-cross plot which fires on all cylinders although we never get told just what kind of a monster our narrator is. Whatever he is, he seems to take lower billing behind a second-string barman character with no mystical sensibilities whatsoever, apart from an unholy affinity for guns and gym-piggery. While the story is serviceable enough, I just wondered who it was about at the end of the day.

“Abduction in Ash” by Dale W. Glaser is a story from a collection of tales concerning the supernatural detective Kellan Oak, scion of druidic parents who deplore his desire to walk the urban landscape and truck with the failings of industrialised humanity. Our hero gets called in on a missing persons case by the absent girl’s distressed mother – she hires Kellan after being told by the police that they can’t open a file on the incident until after 72 hours have passed, something that by now, I’m sure, we’re all aware is a fallacy, right? Time is crucial in these cases and the 48- or 72-hour limit has never been anything other than a convenient literary concept to gain time. Anyway, moving along, it turns out that an Archura, a horned and toothy woodland spirit of great strength, has abducted the teenager with the intent of sacrificing her to its deities at a later stage. Kellan sets out to pin down the perpetrator of the crime driving between an abandoned housing estate and his mother’s herbarium before finally identifying the miscreant and working out what to do with it. There’s a lot of fun stuff going on here – how did he get a dryad to work as his receptionist, for example? – and these glimpses into a wider magical world serve to help the tale become grounded in its own reality.

There’s a large slice of Lovecraft – or, more correctly, Robert W. Chambers – in Aaron Besson’s “Yellow Light District”. The set-up is pure Chandler: femme fatale mother employs hard-bitten P.I. to find her wayward daughter where others – including the police – have failed. Our detective, is jubilant to get the cash, and mutters pointedly about the need to pay his rent in the manner of all such detectives. He hits the streets of the seedier side of Seattle and turns up – bupkis. A whingeing conversation with a shot-glass polishing barkeep reveals that the daughter is now a torch-singer at a nightspot that you can only find if someone tells you about it. Having thus been told about it, our detective finds the bar and has his worldview massively interfered-with. This is meat-and-potatoes gumshoe detection, spiced up by the fact that our private dick bears the name “Rex Giallo” (“King Yellow”), his pale-faced albino nemesis is called “Leroy Jean” (also, “King Yellow” – Jean is a play on the French jaune, or “yellow”), his pub is called “Dim Carcosa” and the mother and daughter are “Cassilda and Camilla Lake”, respectively. How many Kings in Yellow do you need exactly? The story is moody and engaging with some interesting song-lyric poetry, but, apart from giving us a private-eye Everyman to follow about, what was the point? My experience with Hastur-based fiction is often that there’s no point – something happens; everybody goes mad; chaos ensues. In fact the best example of this Mythos trope I’ve encountered was T.E. Grau’s “Monochrome”, re-printed in Volume One of this magazine. Besson’s story strongly reminded me of Kim Newman’s novel The Night Mayor which has an identical set-up; however, in that instance, the device has a solid raison d’ĂȘtre which plays out across the narrative. Here, it just seems arbitrary and in service to some more bad puns, more’s the pity. This tale was re-printed with permission from an earlier journal – perhaps it had greater relevance in that vehicle?

Now for the regular features. First up, the ever-delightful “Borkchito: Occult Doggo Detective” by Sam L. Edwards and Yves Tourigny. What’s not to like about a Chihuahua private-eye dealing with cross-dimensional presences who are messing with his canine clients? The artwork is endearing and the story quite serious in its intent; it takes a couple of reads to get into the swing of the doggy patois in which all of the characters speak (and monologue interiorly), but once you’re there it’s absolute magic.

The ongoing series of linked stories entitled the Occult Legion continues in this issue with a contribution entitled “Faultlines” by publisher Sam Gafford. After this, the Reviews section – a bit light-on in this issue and with an absence of articles which were a pleasing feature of previous entries – gives us an overview of new and thematically-pertinent literature available in electronic form and also hardcopy. James Bojaciuk then continues his column of audio material and podcasts – “Aural Apparitions” – with a review of the latest series of “The Omega Factor” which started life as a televisual property of BBC Scotland in the 1970s – lasting only one season due to opposition by Mary Whitehouse and her gang of prudes - and which has been revived as a series of audio plays for a modern audience. This kind of trawling through the archives of past efforts is one of many places where, for my money, ODQ really comes into its own – I had completely forgotten about this show, but now I’m intent on tracking down all of its iterations.

*****

The body of lore that can be termed supernatural is a vast pool of information and the current focus of fictional and speculative writing teases this ball of twine into many and varied configurations depending upon the aims of the storyteller and the needs of their story. The multitudinous ways in which the writers come at their subject and use the vast expanse of mystical lore available to them to gain their ends is revealed nowhere so well as between the pages of this magazine. Each new story reveals slants and creative cogitation on many levels and leads to fascinating avenues within the canon of supernatural lore. All I can say is that I’m looking forward to more!

*****

Contents:

“Borkchito: Occult Doggo Detective”, Sam L. Edwards & Yves Tourigny
“Songs for Dwindled Gods”, Simon Avery
“Black Frog and Black Scarab”, Davide Mana
“Charms”, Sarah Hans
“The Bascomb Rug”, Josh Reynolds
“The Burning Pile”, Justin Guleserian
“The Case of the Black Lodge”, Aaron Vlek
“The French Lieutenant’s Gurning”, Rhys Hughes
“Abduction in Ash: A Kellan Oakes Adventure”, Dale W. Glaser
“Yellow Light District”, Aaron Besson
Occult Legion: “Faultlines”, Sam Gafford

Reviews:

Deal or No Deal (eBook), William Meikle
Hex-Rated (paperback, eBook), Jason Ridley
Monster Town (paperback, eBook), Bruce Golden
Quest for the Space Gods (paperback, Kindle), Jim Beard & John C. Bruening
“Aural Apparitions” by James Bojaciuk: “The Omega Factor” - series 02 (2017)