Steven Hall, The Raw Shark Texts, Canongate/The Text Publishing Company,
Melbourne Vic., 2008.
Octavo; paperback; 440pp., with many monochrome illustrations.
Mild wear; text block and page edges toned with some spotting. Very good.
Some
years ago now, I encountered a book entitled The House of Leaves which
left me simultaneously excited and infuriated, mostly the latter. The book is
vapid and trite, signifying nothing other than a waste of time on the reader’s
part. And yet, there was such a clamouring by the public for it, amounting to
online discussions and websites tracking the various ramifications of the text.
Most galling was the author’s assertions, along with statements by others
firmly under his spell, that nothing like this had ever been done before and
that he was breaking new ground. This is plainly not the case, as anyone with a
reasonable grasp on the history of Western literature will point out and was
underscored by the blatant ripping-off of Voltaire’s famous dedication (cunningly
translated from the French) at the start of the piece. Why do people think that
the past is ripe for plundering and appropriation when there are more than
enough people out there who will call them on it?
Playing
with the typographic components of the written piece is an exercise that is
almost as old as books themselves. Breaking the narrative into artificial
constraints in order to explore metatextual elements of the prose, ditto. As
Santayana declared, those who are willing to forget the past are those who will
be ostentatiously delighted by its repetition and will suffer the acute
derision of those not so willing to ditch precedent. People who first encounter
these kinds of texts are often surprised and excited by the opening of new
vistas of reading discovery – that’s fine. Those who prey on such readers, on
the other hand, deserve to be called out.
Let’s
take a trip through history, shall we?
In
medieval times, books were written by hand, by monks in scriptoria, who
also decorated the borders and other textual elements of the works that they
were transcribing. Hidden within marginal illustrations were pictorial
commentaries on the characters of those who were paying for these books for
their libraries, or other notable figures of the day. Sometimes these
illustrations were pithy barbs; others were more a reflection of the
illustrator’s state of mind (hungry; bored) or their own views on the text’s
issues. The high tone of a religious tract could be devastatingly undercut by
the appearance within an illuminated capital of a symbolic creature at variance
with the work’s theme: a Fox for example could underscore a scheming intent; a
Wolf, an intemperate greediness; a Hedgehog could signify a sodomite…
The texts themselves could be broken up into a symbolic framework that would not only sell the narrative but would highlight the characters and themes within each section. The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer has such a structure, as does The Decameron by Boccaccio, and A Dream of Red Mansions by Cao Xuequin, to use a non-Western example. Creating such a structure allows the reader to anticipate the text’s arc and engages the reader more fully with the plot. Even de Sade did this with 120 days of Sodom, as did J.G. Ballard in his Atrocity Exhibition.
Using
typography to sell content is not just the preserve of medieval scribes either.
The Life and Times of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman by Laurence Sterne,
written from 1759 to 1767, makes use of marbled paper and other visual,
non-textual elements to get its point across. At one point feeling less than
buoyant, our titular hero reveals his thoughts with nothing more than a
blacked-out page; Stephenie Meyers used a similar device in the first Twilight
novel by allowing a blank page to speak to the state of her heroine’s
depression. This kind of typographical and textual playfulness – and many other
examples like it – have been around for ages. Lewis Carroll anyone?
The
thing that made House of Leaves so exasperating, having emulated all of
these tropes and notions, was its author’s and audience’s wild claims to have
done something new and extraordinary – along with copying T.S. Eliot’s
footnoting fetish and the nested epistolary format common to most Victorian
writing, including Dracula, Frankenstein and The Beetle
– when it’s clear that it was the farthest thing from the truth. The whole
exercise was an example of the creators trying to look smug and clever, rather
than having anything vital and of interest to say. Unlike say, Iain Pears’ An
Instance of the Fingerpost, or Arturo Perez-Reverte’s The Dumas Club
or Italo Calvino’s Castle of Crossed Destinies. Above all, it’s simply
not fun – not even remotely entertaining – to read.
You’ll
understand then, when I say that I was extremely cautious about picking up The
Raw Shark Texts.
This
book was so far off my radar that I only encountered it while shelving stock at
work. I grinned at the cover – riffing off the “Jaws” marketing material
– then I dropped it, and, when picking it back up, I noticed that there seemed
to be some pictorial material within the text. Then I discovered the whole
‘flip-book-shark-attack’ sequence in the back and decided that I needed to take
this volume home for further inspection. I’m glad that I did.
Pictorial
content there is between these covers, but – pleasingly – it’s all in context
with the work at hand and serves a definite purpose within and without the
text. To boil things down, this is a book about a fellow who is being pursued
by a metatextual shark called a “Ludovician”, which patrols the liminal
‘waters’ between symbolic and literal reality, seeking prey. We’ll get back to
this in a minute. Suffice it to say, that at several points in the narrative the
shark breaches the barrier between reality and textuality, and these are
represented by typographical pictures of a shark erupting out of the page. At
one point while the protagonist is submerged in extra-liminal space, this is
represented by a flipbook showing the fish emerging from the distant haze and
barrelling down upon its potential victim, jaws agape. At no point do these
cross-textual images seem gratuitous and they really add to the suspense and
enjoyment of reading the book.
Getting
back to the subject matter: yes, this is a book about a guy being stalked by a
notional shark that wants to devour his memories. We start the book with Eric
Sanderson waking up in his flat having just survived (although he doesn’t
remember it) an almost fatal encounter with the Ludovician. By means of a
series of letters and notes sent to him by his previous (pre-attack)
incarnation (whom he refers to as the First Eric Sanderson) and the attentions
of a self-interested psychologist who believes Eric is suffering from a rare
dissociative disorder, he attempts to re-start his life, a PTSD survivor who
doesn’t know what he’s recovering from.
Various
breadcrumbs from his past existence – a videotape of a lightbulb in a dark
room turning on and off in suggestive sequences; postcards from a holiday on
Naxos; a returning cat named Ian that seems to know Eric of old – put him on a
trail to discover an almost legendary etymologist named Trey Fidorous who might
know the answers to Eric’s dilemma. Along the way he is reminded of a past
doomed love affair with a deceased soulmate, and he encounters another
metatextual survivor on the run from her own demon, a young woman named Scout.
The
first part of the book – the set-up – feels a lot like Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere,
in its fascination for forgotten and abandoned urban environments and obsession
with homeless individuals and their methods of coping with their lot. It rides
the rails of the urban fantasy genre pretty firmly, but without the
ghoulishness or self-absolution present in most works of that ilk: surprisingly,
most homeless people don’t actually have magical places that they can retire to
for food and shelter when night falls, believe it or not. At the, roughly,
halfway point of the narrative the gears shift, and the story takes a different
turn.
If
you’ve seen the movie “Jaws” by Steven Spielberg, then you’ve
experienced what happens to our heroes at the tail end of this novel. In the
movie, the third act involves three characters who set out to sea, hunting the
shark, on a clapped-out old trawler named “Orca”. They establish a tense
hierarchy of command; they rail against each other’s abilities and experience;
they suffer a few frightening moments that force them to work together; the
nominal leader proves to have hopelessly miscalculated his opponent; another
character vanishes during a shark encounter, appearing to have been eaten; and
the last character finally wins the day by sheer luck and grit. Well – SPOILER
ALERT – this is exactly how the back end of this novel pans out, too. Our
heroes build a nominal shark-boat according to consensual readership
expectations (i.e., what a notional audience would expect them to build, based upon a cultural awareness of both the movie and Peter Benchley's novel) and
then they run out this ‘shark-movie playbook’ to win through.
Now,
this might seem like a bit of a cop-out, but there’s a metatextual layer to
this process that requires that these events take place, and which is
supported by the narrative. That’s fine – we’ve been set up to expect it.
However, on an entertainment level, that doesn’t mean that it isn’t a bit ‘ho-hum’ in its execution. Being
told how a thing ends beforehand doesn’t win you any friends, no matter the
excuse for doing it.
I stated above that other books of this sort have failed because they are just not entertaining. That’s not the case here. What we have is a solid mystery and quest novel of the urban fantasy variety, but what makes it even more engaging is the story of Eric’s doomed relationship with the dead Clio and his burgeoning new relationship with the efficient, no-nonsense Scout. This romantic sub-plot underscores the clever-clever technicality of the present dangers and gives the reader an excuse to plough on, quite apart from all the intellectual exercises of the book’s mind-games. And did I mention that Hall is just a beautiful writer? Well, there's that.
So,
on the one hand, this is pretty clearly Neverwhere with a segue into "Jaws",
but it’s also its own beast. The devil here is in the details. Learning about
the strange symbolic world that Eric gets dropped into is a gripping and
fascinating experience. The mystery resolves as his memory returns and the
horrors which populate his sub-liminal, supra-/super-/sub-/meta-/extratextual
nightmare are palpable and weird. I enjoyed the strangeness of it all, along
with Hall’s ability to make it all seem credible and possible. And, did I
mention, there’s a shark-attack flipbook too?!
Since
the book’s release, there have been a lot of online shenanigans surrounding the
work – missing segments and “un-chapters”; discussions of coding techniques
used in the novel – This stuff, for me, is not necessary. I think of it as
extraneous marketing or promotional material, for completists only. I’m not
going to waste my time tracking it all down, but I’m sure others will enjoy
doing so. In the meantime, Hall has penned another tricksy book and I’ve listed
it below, along with another bunch of similar titles – with the exception of House
of Leaves which is not worthy of the association – which fall under the
umbrella of typographically experimental novels.
Three-and-a-half
Tentacled Horrors from me.
*****
Other Typographically Twisty Texts:
Francesco Colonna, Hypnerotomachia Poliphili (1499)
Johannes Trithemius, Steganographia (1499)
"Torquemada" (Edward Powys Mathers), Cain's Jawbone (1934)
Marc Saporta, Composition No. I (1962)
Julio
Cortazar, Hopscotch (1963; translated into English 1966)
Maurice
Roche, Compact (1966; translated in 1988)
B.S. Johnson, The Unfortunates (1969)
Harry Matthews, The Sinking of the Odradek Stadium (1972)
Christine
Brooke-Rose, Thru (1975)
Alasdair
Gray, 1982, Janine (1984)
J.J.
Abrams & Doug Dorst, S (2013)
Amie
Kaufman & Jay Kristoff, Illuminae (2015)
Rian
Hughes, XX (2020)
Steven
Hall, Maxwell’s Demon (2021)
Rian
Hughes, The Black Locomotive (2021)
No comments:
Post a Comment